The word 'mopheadedness' refers to female humans of whatever age whenever and wherever they appear in MIXED-GENDER GENERAL public view wearing LOOSE long hair hanging below mouth level.
One solution about what could be done about it is to ATTEMPT to decimate the entire surface of planet Earth with nuclear weapons - which would, of necessity, also terminate the decimator's OWN bodily existence, being that he or she would also presently live upon Earth [and EARTH is the BEST planet we know of in the entire universe, by FAR!].
Another suggestion is to shoot dead every mophead in sight one happens to see, which - however:
A. would not enlighten questioning people as to the rationale of why the shooter is selectively taking out only certain people while leaving others alive.
B. would probably involve missing a vast majority of mopheaded not available to shoot for myriad causes (such as hiding, on vacation, etc.)
C. might not prevent now modestly hairstyled and future women from going mopheaded, requiring more shooting later on, and
D. would not be fair in view of the shooter's own sins of whatever perversion, lust, or even his or her type of immodesty he or she is guilty of -- not to mention far worse people worth shooting instead or besides.
If not aggressive TERRORISM against mopheaded human females, one has the option of SELF-murder SUICIDE against (not 'for') onesself and thus stand guilty before God.
Another recourse would be to hide away on some non-charted Pacific island with no mopheads nor POTENTIAL mopheads around. Such a choice has SOME merit - although the life of an isolated monastic hermit would seriously limit one's ability to disclose to mopheaded and potentially-mopheaded humanity (let alone the decent and sexually-harassed) how obnoxious, repulsive, disgusting, and despicable public female mopheadedness is to onesself and against others also, even though FEW brave souls would courageously, boldly, and forthrightly admit that.
For the brainless out there in internet land who mindlessly mutter: 'Oh, is that WOMAN-HATER HARPING on HIS HANGUP of that HAIR thing again? I've heard all that BEFORE....' one would be quick to point out (if one had the opportunity) that the mopheaded-hater:
(1) is NOT hating women per se, but instead their PUBLIC mopheadedness
(2) must NOT be accused of 'HARPING' being that such semantical blasphemy is an inappropriate derogatory, term - as is the reviling word: 'HANGUP'
Apart from anti-Israel antisemitism and clear blasphemy against Christianity and resulting persecution against Christians, one almost could wish that Taliban-type, radical-muslim, islamic-fundamentalist-extremist police would take over the country......to arrest, jail, fine, whip, and (if necessary) execute every mophead they come across. Naturally - Taliban attorneys, judges, and juries would always 'second the motion' to punish all such for it all to work out.
Such PHYSICALLY forcing mopheaded pervertesses with ever-increasing levels and degrees of retribution (financially, legally, reputationally, vocationally, and medically) would go a long way to THEM CONSISTENTLY wearing long hair tied back in a single back-of-head ponytail or (better yet) tied up in a chignon (bun) or at least completely covered with a head-covered shawl.
At this point, it is imperative to ALSO include the thought of TOTALLY editing, cutting, smashing, and/or incinerating ALL (porno) images of mopheadedness EVERYWHERE as soon as possible -- whether in 'art'-work, media, 'educational' materials, government document, libraries, family and high-school albums, on driver's licenses, on TV, on the internet, and much more.
The demented and deviantly damnable (i.e. those with DIRTY MINDS, MINDS IN THE GUTTER, MENTALLY-CHALLENGED arrogant and stubborn) blurtle the PSEUDO-'sanctified' FALSELY-'evangelical' excuse-them irrationalization of: 'As long as they believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ and try to live a good life the best they can with the light they have, they will make it into heaven, even though any carnality will be burned up, overlooked and disregarded by the tolerant and broadminded Savior. IF THEY have EVER done anything wrong, maybe they didn't KNOW it, will POSSIBLY find OUT and repent SOMEDAY. Give them a CHANCE in tolerance and mercy. Blessed are the merciful. Turn the other cheek. Give them SPACE to figure things out THEMSELVES pertaining to cultural diversity.'
Those who utter such absurd and outrageous NONSENSE deserve the severest eternal torture in everlasting outer-darkness hellfire!
A. CHILD to MOMMY (near a woman's department store in front of which are large advertisement photos posted of mopheaded models flinging their loose long hair - and maybe also flaunting nude-armed sleevelessness, bare bellies and navels, naked legs, bare feet):
CHILD = Mommy, WHY are those women MIS-dressed so PORNOGRAPHICALLY?
MOMMY = Because they are PERVERTS ignorantly or deliberately devoid of SCRIPTURAL enlightenment and thus are BLIND with ERRANT TWISTED CONSCIENCES who SELFISHLY want to attract attention to THEMSELVES in their GREED for MONEY, SALES, in their LURID CRAVING to ARROGANTLY REBEL against the BIBLE'S MODESTY directives, which DEVIATES demonically entice people to BUY MORE than they really NEED, which MORON customers themselves then SENSELESSLY and NON-THINKINGLY IMITATE the WARPED FASHIONS and STYLES of in MIXED-gender PUBLIC view, causing IRRITATION, GRIEF, PAIN, and even DEATH because of such NON-SOLICITED SEXUAL HARASSMENT.
B. WIFE to HUSBAND inside shopping center:
WIFE = I need some new summer clothes.
HUSBAND = You ALREADY HAVE enough summer clothes.
WIFE = The COLORS I have are BORING, as are the old-fashioned PATTERNS and STYLES.
HUSBAND = The clothes you ALREADY have are not TORN nor STAINED, and you STILL FIT in them. Why not start a CRUSADE to PRESERVE and PROMOTE the OLD styles?
WIFE = All I have for SUMMER wear are SLEEVELESS tops and SHORTS.
HUSBAND = NOW I see your POINT! OBVIOUSLY, you don't want to PORNOGRAPHICALLY FLAUNT your BARE-NAKED ARMS nor NUDE LEGS to MALES you are NOT PRESENTLY MARRIED to, THUS NOT SADISTICALLY TANTALIZE them with FRIGID HOLIER-THAN-THOU MOCK-INNOCENCE DEPRIVATION thereafter. Let's GO for the NEW clothes!
C. MAFIA PARENT to MAFIA KID:
MP = Hey! Where ya goin' lookin' like THAT?
MK = WASSA matter? WASSA wrong?
MP = You AIN'T goin' to CHURCH being MOPHEADED, SLEEVELESS, and wearin' SHORTS!
MK = Hey, it's WARM out. Besides, the OTHER kids are wearin' cool stuff. Why should I look WEIRD? WASSA WRONG with it?
MP = I dunno. Doesn't matter. You weara those clothes and looka like that, I SMASHA your FACE! GET dressed up and TIE up your hair! HURRY UP, we're ready to leave!
D. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHER to STUDENT:
TEACHER = Hey YOU! MOPHEAD! DON'T sit in the FRONT row of MY classroom SHOVING into my face the DISGUSTING OVERLY-EROTIC sight of your LOOSE long hair, naked-armed SLEEVELESSNESS, and legs-baring SHORTENED skirt! You know the rules: 'NO SLEEVES, NO SLACKS, NO SERVICE.' GO and SIT in the BACK!
STUDENT = WHY?
TEACHER = Never mind 'why.' Just DO it, and THEN I might tell you 'why.'
TEACHER = That's better.
STUDENT = What GROUNDS do YOU have to IMPOSE YOUR RELIGIOUS beliefs on ME? WHERE are my CIVIL and HUMAN RIGHTS? My FIRST-AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTY and FREEDOM? WHY the INTOLERANCE of not allowing me to offer MY LAWLESSLESS on YOUR body in SEXUALLY-HARASSING DISCRIMINATORY PREJUDICE and BIAS to do what I want, looking like a GODLESS REBELLIOUS WHORE?
TEACHER = The Bible.
STUDENT = WHAT verses?
TEACHER = Pertaining to your MOPHEADEDNESS (your LOOSE long hair, longer than mouth level, and not tied back in a single back-of-head ponytail nor up in a bun):
there's KJV's Numbers 5:18 and I Corinthians 11:13-16 plus RSV's and NASV's Song of Solomon 7:5 in private groom-with-HIS-OWN-bride context rightly interpreted.
STUDENT = The RSV and NASV over-explicitly mis-state that a (male?) priest must "let the hair of the woman go loose" (although they correctly translated Song 7:5 using the phrase 'flowing locks') while the KJV and NKJV in their Numbers 5:18 imply that a woman in general public view typically wore a Taliban-type shawl for decency. But what has KJV's (not RSV's) I Corinthians 11:13-16 have to do with it? Doesn't it there say that it's glorious for a woman to have long hair?
TEACHER = It does, but does THAT mean she should LOOSELY display her erotically-enticing glorious MOPHEADEDNESS or ANY OTHER similarly glorious body parts as a seductive harlot in general public view? Besides, head-covering shawls SHOULD be worn by mopheaded and non-mopheaded women when praying, being that 'such a custom'; of presuming LOOSE long hair is adequate as a prayer covering is "not recognized by the churches of God' (First Corinthians 11:16 - KJV).
STUDENT = How about nude legs bared by summer shorts and 'bathing' suits?
TEACHER = KJV's and NASV's Isaiah 47:1-4 specifically talks about THE LEG of a DAUGHTER of Babylon. Note that the prophet COULD have INSTEAD specifically used the word 'idols' of heathen; instead -- but did NOT. Why 'legs?' What does 'LEGS' have to do with anything?
STUDENT = Isaiah ordered the 'daughter of BABYLON' to 'uncover THE leg.' (The RSV improperly and over-graphically pluralized leg). WHICH 'leg?'
TEACHER = Give me a break.
STUDENT = Was Isaiah being SARCASTIC, or a PERVERT, when he demanded a leg to be uncovered?
TEACHER = In verse 3, he related leg uncovering to 'nakedness being exposed' and 'shame seen.' Yet many even today have a brazen harlot's brow, don't know how to blush, and refuse to be ashamed (Jeremiah 3:3, 6:15, and Ezekiel 16:30).
KEY: RH = Religious Heretic
RH1 vs. ME
RH1 = I see that you quoted Isaiah 47 verses 1 through 4 to try to prove your anti-woman bigotry. You dirty pervert! You should be arrested and put away where you belong!
ME = You are SHEEET.
RH1 = You are an AZHOAL!
ME = END of communication! [I walk away, as he or she blatters blasphemous, vile, filthy, vicious reviling behind me]
RH2 vs. ME
RH2 = I see that you quoted Isaiah 47:1-4 to prove your anti-sex bias and prejudice. Get a life! Get your mind out of the gutter! Quit bothering people!
ME = You are pig manure.
RH2 = You are toxic hazardous-waste SEWAGE!
ME = END of communication! [I walk away, as he or she mouths hateful, threatening profanities behind me]
RH3 vs. ME
RH3 = I noticed that you quoted Isaiah 47 verses 1 through 4 to proof-text YOUR CULTIC theological OBSESSION. Those verses are OUTDATED and OBSOLETE for OUR CULTURE. They all WERE ALLEGORICAL METAPHORS meant to indicate SOME moral PRINCIPLE, and you are MISINTERPRETING them OUT OF CONTEXT.
ME = BULL-and-HORSE crp!
RH3 = DON'T spew ANY MORE VULGARITIES in MY presence! I won't STAND for it!
ME = OK, YOU are FECES. DUNG. EXCREMENT. WORTHLESS GARBAGE. VILE FILTH. SNOT. VOMIT. DIARRHEA. NOXIOUS STENCH. PUTRID SLIME. RANCID TOILET OVERFLOW....
RH3 = GOD DAM YOU TO HELL for not letting me continue to impose my demonic, discouraging, Spirit-quenching, Scripture-twisting, heretical indoctrination and absurd brainwashing on you! You're SICK, SICK, SICK!
ME = FUHHKK you! [I walk away, as he or she vehemently spews out deviant, demented curses, threatening false prophecies against me, and derogatory shouts and shrieks bordering on rock-toss stoning]
RH4 vs. ME
RH4 = I see you quoted Isaiah 47 verses 1 through 4 in relation to your aversion against supposedly "normal" but PERHAPS naive LADIES exposing their naked legs with what YOU call "immodest" legwear to understandably be cool and comfortable in the shade and air-conditioning plus get nicely-tanned and non-anemic-looking.
That Scripture was meant for a BABYLONIAN VIRGIN it speaks of, but we are NOW under grace, not under law. Essentially, for US in our MODERN dispensation of tolerance and soul-winning by kind, non-offensive, gentle, positive self-esteem love in forgiveness of our neighbors as ourselves, those enshrined ancient words have been fulfilled and are now out of step with present divine enlightenment, liberty, and freedom for all in Christ, and thus inappropriate to apply to us nowadays.
ME = WRONG, heresy-head....and further communication with you is POINTLESS. Buzz off. [As I begin to walk away, he or she quickly calls out:]
RH4 = Wait! Those SYMBOLIC words WERE pertinent in times PAST, but the moral majority in the evangelical church agreed and agrees that that was and is antiquated HISTORY!
ME = Merely valid back in history to a few Jews? WRONG AGAIN, Beelzebub-Breath.
RH4 = Look, Frizz-Face: WHO are YOU -- God's JUDGMENTAL gift to humanity -- to insinuate that they STILL apply to US NOWADAYS? C'mon, GET with the PROGRAM! Wake up and smell the coffee! Get with the NEW millennium.
Man judges by outward appearances; God judges the heart and motives. Don't sweat the small stuff.
ME = Shut up! They STILL mean EXACTLY what they SAY, and STILL APPLY NOWADAYS!
RH 4 = Is that CEREMONIAL or MORAL JEWISH law? Ceremonial law was fulfilled in Christ our Sacrificial Lamb. 'There is now neither male nor female, all are one in Christ, and so we're all neuters' (Galatians 3:28). Is not female dress a matter of adiaphora? We're saved through FAITH in immodesty- NOT modestly-decent works of the LAW! CHRIST paid the price for our Hebrews-10 atonement, sanctification, and perfection in HIM alone.....even for a WEAKER brother in Christ like you...someone who obviously has trouble with the declaration: "I can do ALL fuhkd-up things in Christ who strengthens me."
ME = At THIS point, it is IRRELEVANT WHO paid any prices for ANYTHING. 'We are justified by doing GOOD and not EVIL works, NOT faith alone' (James 2:24). The subject at hand is that "woman should be dressed modesty in decent apparel in every place" (I Timothy 2:8-9).
RH4 = Even in the bathtub, or when born?
ME = You, in your OBVIOUSLY-overbroad sarcasm - SUCK.
RH4 = DON'T talk to me ANYMORE! YOU'RE a NITPICKY LEGALIST, under MENTALLY-ILL BONDAGE controlled by SATAN, hopelessly POLLUTED by PORNOGRAPHY! God MAY save you in SPITE of YOURSELF. [I walk away and say nothing, as Christ as silent to that baby-murderer John-beheading fox Herod, whom God's angel thankfully slew eventually according to Acts 12:23].
In summary, I recently attended a church in which some of the women had their hair tied in a ponytail, while others had their long hair LOOSE. The fresh was mixed with the rotten, kerosene with the corn, heroin with the sugar, maggots with the meat, saints with the sinners, piss with the pop, poop with the pudding, those destined to be blessed in heaven and those destined to be damned in hell. WHAT should be my approach to the latter?
The FIRST way is to AVOID such PSEUDO-"angelic" FOOLS. LEAVE their presence. GO AWAY FROM and STAY AWAY FROM THEM as much as possible (Proverbs 14:7, Romans 16:17, II Timothy 3:5, II John 1:8-11). TURN your HEAD AWAY FROM THEM. KEEP your BACK to THEM. LOWER your EYES to avoid looking at their non-solicited point-blank mopheadedness. SHUT your EYES rather than having to stare at some mophead seated in front of you.
Such is NOT "cowardice" but instead is WISDOM. PRUDENT and UNDERSTANDABLE escapism (Proverbs 27:12 = 'a prudent man sees danger and hides himself, but the naive and gullible go on, and suffer for it'). HOLY and RIGHTEOUS 'survival of the fittest'
The OTHER way is to aggressively, courageously, boldly, reprove and attack VERBALLY those who disturb your serenity and peace of mind (Proverbs 10:10, Titus 2:15) with something like the following:
'Excuse me, but your indecent, lewd, non-asked-for, immodest, LOOSE-long-haired MOPHEADEDNESS you are either ignorantly or deliberately IMPOSING into my viewing area is extremely IRRITATING to me. Your faithless, pointless, overly-sensuous MOPHEADED hairstyle inordinately turns me on, but obviously neither you nor I are presently in any position to do anything erotic to, against, or with each other. If I tried, you probably would only react with terrified hypocritically pseudo-prudish and sadistic rejection against me. Therefore, either promptly LEAVE the premises and get OUT of my view......or promptly go to some store, buy some kind of hairband, tie up your mopheadedness into a back-of-head ponytail, up in a bun, wear a shawl, whatever so I can at least talk at you as a CIVIL person WITHOUT getting VISUALLY assaulted SEXUALLY by your walking-pornography stupidity and asinine worldly lasciviousness.'
A disbeliever would (in enraged response) belligerently retort with something like: "GET OUTA MY WAY, butthead bastard! That's YOUR problem! Go and crawl back under the rock you were HIDING under".....which non-compliant response may cause me to reply:
"NO, YOU are the accursed Asherah; YOU'RE the sexual PERVERT! Get your SICK and DISGUSTING CARCASS OUTA my FACE!'....which would then possibly begin a serious face-slapping session, frantic cellphone calls to 911, a spectators-involved fistfight with possible knife wounds, a gunfight with the cops, and much worse.
In contrast, a CHRISTIAN gal would be startled and possibly run away as fast as she could in shock - perhaps to tell her parents or the pastor - all of who.....after read the aforementioned pertinent HAIRSTYLE (NOT 'hair')-related Bible verses in the APPLICABLE Bible TRANSLATIONS in context, rightly interpreted, and non-metaphorically applied.......would possibly result in her sheepishly returning [red-faced] with her hair rightly tied back or up as previously mentioned.