Gal Hair 1

When most people speak of Heaven or Hell, they have fuzzy thinking at best, and despicable presumptions at worst.

This is, in part, the fault of those who revile religious information on actual Hell, being judgmentally, critically, viciously, cruelly, and harshly condemnatory against "hellfire-and-brimstone preachers" and "Bible-thumpers."

Further consideration of the slander of such accursed creeps, who mis-believe that their doubts and disbelief, their taunts and blattering, are sufficient to override and eradicate the hellfire words of Jesus Christ, is needless and senseless, and will not be elaborated upon here.

For example, Ultimate Hell is in NO way synonymous with some frequently-burning gehenna garbage pit over in the Middle East.

Some mis-assert that war is "hell." War is not synonymous with Hell, because war is temporary and takes place within vastly-different environmental conditions Hell does not have nor ever will have.

Hell is something not of this world, and nothing in this world nor on Earth nor in the entire Universe can begin to compare with actual Hell. "What eye has not seen and what ear has not heard" God has prepared for those who hate Him.

To try to describe in human language what Hell is really like would involve use of such starting scratch-the-surface concepts as being incinerated alive continuously, or like being doused with gasoline and set afire over and over (thus in never-ending torture), being repeated clobbered in the head with a mallet, like being in an underground cave with all the lights switched off, and being in constant solitary confinement where there is wailing, cursing, and irrevocable non-relenting regret, accentuated by the perpetual fiery torment worse than pressing one's hand on the red-hot burner of a stove.

Here is some of what the Lord and His Scripture say about Hell:

Isaiah 50:11 Hey, all you who kindle a fire, who set brands alight! Walk by the light of your fire, and by the brands which you have kindled! This shall you have from my hand: you shall lie down in torment.
Matthew 25:41 Then he will say to those at his left hand, 'Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels;
Mark 9:48 where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.
Luke 16:23 and in Hades, being in torment, he lifted up his eyes, and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus in his bosom.
Luke 16:24 And he called out, 'Father Abraham, have mercy upon me, and send Lazarus to dip the end of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am in anguish in this flame.'
Luke 16:26 And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, in order that those who would pass from here to you may not be able, and none may cross from there to us.'
2Thessalonians 1:9 They shall suffer the punishment of eternal destruction and exclusion from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might,
Revelation 19:20 And the Beast was captured, and with him the False Prophet who in his presence had worked the signs by which he deceived those who had received the Mark of the Beast and those who worshiped his image. These two were thrown alive into the Lake of Fire that burns with sulphur.
Revelation 20:10 and the Devil who had deceived them was thrown into the Lake of Fire and Sulphur where the Beast and the False Prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night to the ages of the ages.
Revelation 20:14 Then Death and Hades were thrown into the Lake of Fire. This is the Second Death, the Lake of Fire;
Revelation 20:15 and if any one's name was not found written in the Book of Life, he/she was thrown into the Lake of Fire.

Who will be in everlasting Hell?

Those who presume that it is not wrong nor a big deal to occasionally make an allegedly "understandable" human error or mistake such as a little "not-that-harmful" shoplifting, cheating on tests, swearing with vulgarity while angrily using God's name in vain, telling dirty stories to get laughs, inflicting a little terroristic mischief against someone or their property, getting tattooed and pierced, doing a little lustful kissing and necking and petting without being married, enjoying a little masturbation-causing porn now and then, relish telling a half-lie, being dressed somewhat immodestly during warm days pertaining to mopheaded hairstyle and inadequate armwear and legwear and footwear (such as wearing sandals and flipflops wthout socks and thus exposing toes in general public view), smoking a cigarette now and then to show off how smart-ass worldly and impiously irreligious one is, doing a little gossipping, sarcastically reviling or condemning or accusing someone without bonafide justification, tailgating impatiently or speeding over the limit to despise law-enforcement authority and respect for such, arrogantly asserting that women are equal with men and should maliciously compete against them, being tolerant with homogay belligerence, mindlessly promoting and declaring the myth of heretical evolutionism with hatred against creationism and creationists, seeing nothing wrong in committing (and not "performing") abortion homicide and supporting so-called "rights" of those who use weaselwords like "pro-choice" and "reproductive freedom" and "clinics" and "doctors" and "birth control" with reference to the supposed "it" and not "he" nor "she" within the womb, etc.

Will any of the above be in Heaven? They will not, nor would they want to be!

Will "you're-forgiven/God-forgives-you-in-unconditional-love-anyway," "only-God-is-perfect-so-don't-sweat-it" repeat offenders who casually tell others to "just let it slide" and "don't get hung-up about it with a self-destructive guilt trip" be in Heaven, or want to be in Heaven? Absolutely not!

How about those who recognize even the slightest sin as not acceptable, who want and intend to never sin ever again?


Matthew 22:1 And again Jesus spoke to them in parables, saying,
2 "The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who gave a marriage feast for his son,
3 and sent his servants to call those who were invited to the marriage feast; but they would not come.
4 Again he sent other servants, saying, 'Tell those who are invited, Hey, I have made ready my dinner, my oxen and my fat calves are killed, and everything is ready; come to the marriage feast.'
5 But they made light of it and went off, one to his farm, another to his business,
6 while the rest seized his servants, treated them shamefully, and killed them.
7 The king was angry, and he sent his troops and destroyed those murderers and burned their city.
8 Then he said to his servants, 'The wedding is ready, but those invited were not worthy.
9 Go therefore to the thoroughfares, and invite to the marriage feast as many as you find.'
10 And those servants went out into the streets and gathered all whom they found, both bad and good; so the wedding hall was filled with guests.
11 "But when the king came in to look at the guests, he saw there a man who had no wedding garment;
12 and he said to him, 'Friend, how did you get in here without a wedding garment?' And he was speechless.
13 Then the king said to the attendants, 'Bind him hand and foot, and cast him into the outer darkness; there men will weep and gnash their teeth.'
14 For many are called, but few are chosen."

Matthew 7:21 "Not every one who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven."

Luke 6:46 "Why do you call me 'Lord, Lord,' and not do what I tell you?"

Last night I heard lecturer Brian Young of the creationist group TCCSA state that there is no such thing as "race" pertaining human beings.

Now, I had always believed that all of us human lifeforms had a common ancestor lineage with Adam and Eve, of course, and even that everyone's more recent ancestors all stepped off The Ark together back in the days of Noah's Worldwide Flood. But it never occurred to me that the different colors of skin, eye-fold dissimilarities, nose and mouth varieties, etc. of those of the same human "kind" (I won't use the word: species) generally congregrated in localized geographical areas on Earth did NOT constitute different and unique "races."

That sort of shocked me, being that I remember seeing in federal and state forms the phrase: "State your Race - whether white, black, asian..." and so on. So I did some research, and here is is:

Contrast the Revised Standard Version wordings with the King James 21 Version in the only passages where the word "race" is used by the RSV in the entire Bible:

Ezra 9:2 (RSV) For they have taken some of their daughters to be wives for themselves and for their sons; so that the holy race has mixed itself with the peoples of the lands....
Ezra 9:2 (KJ21) For they have taken their daughters for themselves and for their sons, so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands

Acts 7:19 (RSV) He dealt craftily with our race....
Acts 7:19 (KJ21) He dealt craftily with our kindred....

Romans 9:3 (RSV) For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen by race.
Romans 9:5 (RSV) to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ. God who is over all be blessed for ever. Amen.
Romans 9:3 (KJ21) For I could wish that I myself were accursed from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh,
Romans 9:5 (KJ21) of whom are the fathers, and from whom, according to the flesh, Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.

1Peter 2:9 (RSV) But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God's own people....
1Peter 2:9 (KJ21) But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a peculiar people.....

So now we all know one source concocting and perpetuating this peculiar case of errant semantics which has infiltrated and been engrained into mis-worded government forms, pertaining to imposition of the wrong word "race" instead of the words that should rather be used. Oh well, as one who grew up with the mixed-bag RSV, I learn something new every day.

And now I know why the ladies of the RSV-questioning Baptist Bible study group objected to my referring to "Jews" (whether patriarchal blood descendants, or those either Hebrew or non-Hebrew who are circumcised in "the heart" and not necessarily flesh) as: "the Master Race."

Creationist Brian Young also startled me by stating that there is no such thing as "prehistoric," being that the Bible records things created in the Old-Testament book of Genesis right from the beginning, before which history there was nothing historical to record and thus comprise history. Damn the brainwashing and misconceptions of heretical mis-wordings and false concepts concocted and mouthed by accursedly deviant and demented evolutionists and their ilk!

Thank God for phone operators of businesses and government who answer customer queries in good old TV-and-radio-newscaster English, instead of foreign-dialect-influenced hispanic, ebonic, or asian non-comprehendable jibberish.

Down with commercial entities who have some automated feminist voice come on with something like: "Now, what is your problem? Speak clearly into the phone and I will direct your call." - with or without a frustrating merry-go-round of almost-endless voicemail options following.

' Praise Jesus for direct and friendly, non-critical/non-condemnatory, live-person operators who talk easily-understood newscaster-like non-foreigner-uttered English....and screw both demonic "non-discrimination" and satanic "diversity."

Getting back to the weird concept of "race," it would not be in anyone's best interests to force another person to marry or even continuously associate with a person of a different amount of melanin (resulting in various degrees of skin coloration) in them....if that anyone did not want it to be so. Mandatory integration can result in people getting stabbed or shot.

It is not possible to define what a "Christian" is, just as it is impossible to say about a preborn babe that it is a boy or girl. A human being, made in the non-animal image of God (with a soul and not merely a body and spirit), is never a "what" nor an "it," but instead is to be properly designated with the gender (and not neuter) pronoun of either "he" or "she."

Who is a Christian?

To be a Christian, one must be intrinsically HONEST. Honest about the existence of things around him or her, that he or she themselves nor their ancestors did not created and could not have created it all, that such natural phenomena obviously have intelligent design and are beautiful and powerful and innovatively created plus stable and consistent and extensive, besides being non-stoppable and trustworthy.

They are frankly, forthrightly, and shamelessly honest about the existence of The HOLY BIBLE (the Sacred-66-books Judeo-Christian Scripture), and not arrogantly, presumptuously, and falsely discount nor dispute the contents therein without first prepared to cite irrefutable proof.

They are honest to admit that neither they nor any other wayward human has verifiable authority to discredit whatever in the Bible they cannot fully understand or have a hard time believing, and they must accept and like the fact that the Creator (as described in Scripture) is greater than they themselves and any other human being other than the God-man Divinely-human Architect of the Universe and Master-Jew Savior and Lord (Jesus) mentioned in Scripture....and they increasingly comply with ALL His sundry directives and imperatives and commands for acceptable living always and in everything with the assured promise and threat of irrevocable damnation for any and all violations committed and not performed.

The evidence of that innate and intrinsic compliance with reality in all its myriad aspects will become more and more evident by displayed "fruits of the Spirit" (love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness) more and more consistently exhibited to others and notably to those who deserve to be exhibited with such. The telltale icing on the cake as to who is a genuine and authentic "Christian" will be a frequently-spoken and proselyting witness for Jesus as Redeemer while proclaiming His gospel to others and teaching them to observe and do all that He has commanded them.....without substitutionary recourse to stifling self-righteousness and suppression caused by loveless legalistic ritualism and harshly-indiscriminate, play-it-by-the-book, humanistic and egotistical tyranny - rife and reeking with capricious man-made rules.

Heaven will be populated only with those who are and like such fruits of the Spirit, and completely devoid of those who in contrast hate and despise such fruits and those associated with such relentlessly righteous and holy behavior. As Christ Himself inferred, there will be many who will rather be confined and content in fiery torment in outer darkness forever, and merely a remnant who will instead be saved and in the absolute, 24/7, non-selfish and non-questioning, non-impudent perfection of (plus non-deceitful non-immoral service within) Heaven.

What subject do I now have in mind? What subject do most men and women have in mind much of the time? What subject do TV and magazine advertisers use to attract attention? What does the Bible describe extensively throughout the entire content of sixty-six books?

OK, it's time to come right out with it.

What do you see a lot of during seasonably warm days (and nights), which you [thankfully] do not see during frigidly-cold winter days and nights? What does the Devil's media use to attract your attention and to titillatingly tantalize you? What is the basis for all the commotion about abortion homicide and a woman's purported "right" (not simply: capacity) involving "choice?" What is AIDS and venereal disease rather-directly related to? How about the all the hubbub about condoms and contraceptives? And premarital pregnancies? What is the touchy-touchy feelie-feelie extramarital fornication and adultery generally caused and exacerbated by?

What do irrational legalists refer to what they erroneously state that "God only judges by the inward person, not outward appearances"? And we have all heard the excuses about the need to tan, display tanned carcasses for pompous-azz pride, exclaiming and presuming that "it's "warm" out" and "I don't want to sweat," "Everybody's doing it - it's perfectly normal and is the conventional style and fashion for this time of year," etc. etc. ad nauseum.

What looks different about how girls and women in general public view appear nowadays compared to how their great-great-great-great-great grandmothers who lived before 1920 looked back then? Why the change?

What is usually acquired and enjoyed in privacy, away from accusatory and condemnatory eyes and mouths....compared to what hideousness is instead blatantly imposed in non-solicited general public view? What do many librarians and others prudishly censor on network computer screens, but then hypocritically allow to enter and move around within library and other premises?

The ideal, which we get from Scripture, is that all human females walking in and sitting around would be wearing ponytails in back of their heads, long-sleeved blouses, full-length (NOT shortened) slacks or long skirt, and socks on feet under sandals or other footwear.

Hence, the entrance sign posted at or on the doorways of various public buildings:

No Sleeves
No Slacks
No Socks
No Service

or something like that.

There are two basic types of general-public-displayed sexual and erotic impurity: 1 Live-person, full-sized, in-color, in-motion, non-restricted, "legally"-allowed, non-solicited, incomplete bodily exposure of merely (mopheaded) loose long hair, naked arms, nude legs, toes-bared feet, and usually nothing much else....or

2 NON-live-person, merely photographic, smaller-sized, restricted and private, somewhat "illegal," asked-for and therefore solicited, usually-complete-and-total, bodily exposure of what is exposed in (1) above PLUS a logical completion of the satisfying exposure of all other outwardly-visible body parts.

Some might wonder why there can't be both types allowed, and "what's the big deal"?

The goofs who wonder: "What's the big deal?" are fools who simply are not thinking, comprehending, nor contemplating the extensive and far-reaching effects and consequences of both (1) and (2) above. We, for the time being, will let such vile vermin wallow in their own self-righteous and arrogantly-noncooperative ignorance.

There is a certain honestly and forthrightness about not only the young well-proportioned and attractive female models who humbly, voluntarily, cooperatively, kindly, and perhaps greedily pose for privately-public/publicly-private porn, and the want-people-to-enjoy-life-and-God's-creation pimp-types who publicly but discreetly (though often for monetary profit) publicize related photos and movies for private and personal viewing for each man of the public who is interested and has been sadistically enticed (carrot-on-a-stick-style) by usually-anonymous passersby who couldn't care less about the erahtic desires and well-being of those they indiscriminately are seducing by their mis-dressed lasciviousness.

Conversely, there is a certain hypocritical dishonesty about gals who bare only certain parts of their body, expecting no one to be affected (let alone adversely affected) by such non-asked-for not-reliably-consistent exhibition of those parts and nothing beyond that......and expecting no one to admit to what those compromisingly mis-attired gals are doing as to what they are exhibiting and not exhibiting - let alone stating possible or probable irrationalizations (not "reasons") of why they are committing (not "performing") such non-solicited obnoxious atrocities.

It is quite understandable that men would want porn - which can reliably be located geographically, readily handled, and willingly available for easy and quick manipulation with always-consensual utilization - instead of the fleeting, partially-indecent, somewhat-immodest, frequently-anonymous live persons who they generally cannot capture and control....who (more often than not) object with non-compliance and non-cooperation in anti-patriarchal/matriarchal-authority moody and chauvinistic whims of arrogant and insubordinate feminist sexism.

The factor of the tyranny of possibly-already-married-or-engaged, partially-immodest, live-person human females hypocritically and sadistically saying NO! and/or call 911 for police assistance concerning men's logical follow-up with her to their partial-immodesty seduction is completely neutralized when it comes to the never-objecting images of birthday-suit-bared pretty young females in porn pics and movies. A few bottom-line Scripture verses should enlighten both type of gals mentioned above as to God's primal intentions and inspired directives. Check them out:


Numbers 5:18 And the priest shall set the woman before the LORD, and unbind the hair of the woman's head, and place in her hands the cereal offering of remembrance, which is the cereal offering of jealousy. And in his hand the priest shall have the water of bitterness that brings the curse.

Song 7:5 Your head crowns you like Carmel, and your flowing locks are like purple; a king is held captive in the tresses.

First Corinthians 11:14 Does not nature itself teach you that for a man to wear long hair is degrading to him,
First Corinthians 11:15 but if a woman has long hair, it is her pride? For her hair is given to her for a covering.
First Corinthians 11:16 If any one intends to be contentious, we recognize no such practice, nor do the churches of God.

First Timothy 2:8-9 [I would].....that women should adorn themselves modestly and sensibly in decent apparel.....


Second Samuel 13:18 Now she was wearing a long-sleeved full-length robe; for thus were the virgin daughters of the king traditionally clad.

First Timothy 2:8-9 [I would].....that women should adorn themselves modestly and sensibly in decent apparel.....


Isaiah 47:1 Come down and sit in the dust, virgin daughter of Babylon; sit on the ground without a throne, daughter of the Chaldeans! For you shall no more be called tender and delicate.
Isaiah 47:2 Take the millstones and grind meal, put off your veil, strip off your robe, uncover your legs, pass through the rivers.
Isaiah 47:3 Your nakedness shall be uncovered, and your shame shall be seen. I will take vengeance, and I will spare no man.

First Timothy 2:8-9 [I would].....that women should adorn themselves modestly and sensibly in decent apparel.....


Jeremiah 2:25 Keep your feet from going unshod and your throat from thirst. But you said, 'It is hopeless, for I have loved strangers, and after them I will go.'

First Timothy 2:8-9 [I would].....that women should adorn themselves modestly and sensibly in decent apparel.....

Some blatter that the above verses do not mean anything. So they blatter.
Some blatter that the above verses no longer apply. So they blatter.
Some blatter that one should not focus and concentrate on such verses. So they blatter.
Some blatter that the above verses are only metaphors or euphemisms applying to idol worship. So they blatter.
Some blatter that the above verses only applied to some ancient people a long time ago. So they blatter.
Some blatter that the word meanings changed in translation from Hebrew and Greek to English. So they blatter.
Some blatter that the above verses have to be taken in context and must be rightly interpreted.

So they blatter.

The words will not change. They always and only mean exactly what they say and what typical dictionaries define them as meaning. They mean what is obviously implied. Lots of other words could have been used instead of the exact and precise words that were used. The words directly relate and clearly apply to BOTH historical and present-day reality and problematic situations and contemporary social issues.

Despite nay-saying and froward blurbilizing blatterers.

TOPIC: Obamascare Sordidity

The pathetic mess of Obamanites trying to implement NON-Affordable NON-Workable Obamascare was both predicted and anticipated. And the whole thing will only get worse until it is completely restructured or repealed - if America will internally last that long before total implosion and chaotic anarchy happens.

It is no wonder that DHS and various other government departments and agencies are stocking up on phenomenal hordes of hollow-point ammunition plus other police and military armaments.

Obama should have been content with the suggestion of cradle-to-grave Medicare and Medicaid readjustment proposed by Alan Grayson, and funded it by across-the-board voluntary increase in FICA paycheck withdrawals with the provision of immediately-operational, actual-and-not-merely-promised, compounded-interest retirement savings accounts for willing participants.

As it has turned out, neither righteous anti-Obamanites nor wicked Obamanites are willing to give the equivalent of church offering-plate monies to those irresponsible who have incurred self-destructive preexisting conditions upon themselves by their own fault.

The good-faith financial sacrifice for Obama only goes so far with a substantial number of frustrated and angry voters who are suddenly somewhat dangerously impoverished by new health-policy-insurance costs (both direct and indirect), and the much-touted discriminatorily-granted Obamascare waivers to Obamanite lapdogs from Obama discriminatorily exempting his biased patronizers from Obamascare binding have been neutralized and overridden by self-destructing health insurance companies now experiencing Obamascare deadline mandates and customer retractions they previously feared: dispensing and dispersing huge settlement monies to those who have irresponsibly inflicted themselves with preexisting conditions along with the fact that strapped-for-cash young people are not signing up in droves for debilitating-residual-expense-out-of-their-wallets health-insurance policies in missing and absent fervent and loyal patriotism to their once-political-idol Obama, causing those health insurers to re-write health-insurance policies against those who already having health policies with them but jacking up the premium costs and deductibles on the re-writes so that those insurers themselves don't go belly up. So, in one sense, it is true that people "could keep" their policies with alleged "grandfathered-in" health insurers, but actually NOT keep their policies with "grandfathered-in" immunity but instead "could [merely] keep" the same insurers who have already insured them in the past, with the practical bottom line being that those "kept policies" are mandatorily re-written with higher deductibles, higher premiums, and frequently less or inadequate coverage by the deadline or else IRS fines are imposed on the procrastinators inable to successfully proceed through the non-functioning Obamascare website.

Obama errantly presumed that young democrat idealists, devoid of substantial financial resources by being burdened with school and car loans and mortgages and unemployment (exacerbated by sadistic anti-Christian feminists-run human-resource twits), and eager to express their anti-establishment racist rebellion and war-like defiance against Israel-protector George W Bush, would readily sign up for high-cost health-insurance premiums for the sake of pleasing their pet-politician black-tin-god Obama.

Obama miscalculated that those he promised free food stamps and welfare checks and housing perks and illegal amnesty would, out of their near-religious appreciation for Obama obviously lying about his actual birth certificate and birthplace, and love of his weasel-worded fake-christian pro-abortion-homicide/pro-homoperversion/underlying-muslim-antisemitic deceptiveness, go out and get jobs when jobs were not available, and decide to do discipline themselves to hard labor if they had found jobs rather than staying on Obama's free-lunch gravy-train handouts.

Obama miscalculated that he and cultic-catholic Pelosi with constipated-immentality narrow-mindedly-stubborn Reid and their demonic disillusioned and defiant ilk could force law-abiding senior and middle-aged Christians and Jews (who hated Obama's platform of partial-birth abortion, homosexual pseudo-marriages, reaction against Israeli settlements, acquiescing to antisemitic arab extremists, and sexist appointment of a couple of inferior-gender women to the High Court) . . . by mandatory IRS law and penalty . . . to fork over money for the ancient-plantation-reparations-bestowed doped-up graffiti-and-gang-nigroid-and-dego/spic other irresponsibles who have carelessly and foolishly inflicted themselves with preexisting venereal or addictive conditions.

And the motive for Obama concocting the idea of forced Obamascare? Retaliation against all Americans for his own mother not being able to get anti-cancer treatment because of some medical-insurance ineligibility supposedly to blame for her non-treated demise. Sort of like a disgruntled company worker being fired, then wickedly stealing a firearm to genocidally gun down all the innocent employees in that company he could see at the time for insane mindless revenge.

Keep in mind that ONLY HALF of all subversive-media-brainwashed voting Americans voted for Obama - BOTH times (in 2008 and 2012).

Keep in mind that some decisive voter fraud and extortive coercion was used in the process - BOTH times.

Keep in mind that a SLIGHT Obamanite-majority under Reid in the Senate and a SLIGHT Obamanite-majority under Pelosi in the House passed Obamascare, and that ALMOST half of the U.S. Supreme Court (especially Antonin Scalia) were vehemently opposed to deeming Obamascare "constitutional."

Obama has fallen short, like he indicated when discussing his alleged "christianity" mentioning Jesus and sins forgiven with Rick Warren, which sins Obama stated he "HOPED had been washed away." "Hoped?" THAT does NOT sound like he had the assurance of salvation, DOES it? And no wonder, for a person who does not emphatically state that Jesus Christ is THE ONLY way to God and Heaven, but instead patronizes Islam as much as seeming to ally with Jeremiah-Wright/Al-Sharpton/Marty-King-type damn-America faux "christianity."

Obama's purported "christianity" does NOT consist of rightly embracing the directives of the Torah he has ridiculed by impious questioning various parts of it, nor despising abortion "rights" nor despising homogay "rights" as he MIS-called them . . . but instead expecting people to work for him in response to his lying professional rhetoric and grandiose platitudes to promote his heavy-handed socialist agenda. He neither crosses his heart Catholic-style, nor had his hand over his heart when the American flag was present. His lapel pin was not one accurately representing the American flag, but instead one which had diagonal stripes. His IRS has deprived Tea Partyists, and his NSA has disregarded privacy provisions of the Fourth Amendment.

He, like Adolf Hitler, has fired military generals for nitpicky moralistic or procedural infractions - trifles compared to the extensive blatant lies and egregious deception he himself and his patsies (such as Carney, Sebelius, Lerner, etc.) are guilty of.

It matters not if the Obamascare signup website is fixed. Young people, no matter what non-trustworthy pie-in-the-sky-by-and-by promise of exemptions are made, simply will not enslave themselves to something they absolutely cannot depend upon and cannot even access, and would bankrupt them besides with excessive monthly or quarterly or semi-annual or annual health insurance premium costs which, because of fine-print loopholes, would in essence covering nothing they really need at this time in their lives.

It matters not if the Obamascare signup website is fixed, being that there are so many people who have already had their previously-acceptable-enough health policies cancelled in effect - in sneaky quasi-contradiction to what Obama promised - and are more than willing and ready to retaliate against the Obama who has and continues to promote the Planned-Parentlessness murder against non-born human babes, sicken and weaken American neighborhoods and towns and cities with non-"human"-"rights" disgusting artificially-"legal" homosexual impositions, and is, in so many foreign-policy ways, working against the well-being and safety of Israel.

It matters not if the Obamascare signup website is fixed, because doctors simply will not be bound by the red tape restrictions imposed by Obamascare, and hospitals will not become sacked with Obamascare-instigated Medicare manipulations all in the name of alleviating Medicare fraud and abuse.

Vehicle insurance for driving cars can be and is essentially forced on those who drive cars -- but to force people to pay for their own God-given and God-maintained health is essentially like taxing them for simply being alive, and for God-given free atmospheric air, ocean and lake water, gravity, sunlight, etc. and attempting to restrict and tyrannize their breathing, walking, urination, defection, and private marital sexual behaviors by regulating related commercial accessories used in the processes.

Even the future VOLUNTARY Mark of the Beast will NOT - unlike forced and fines-imposed Obamascare - be mandatory nor involuntary, even though no one will be able to engage in government-registered commerce without that Mark.

And at that time, it will be more than website snafu that besets those who consign themselves to the satanic Mark:

Rev 16:2 And the first went and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the humans who had the mark of the beast and upon those who worshiped his image.

It will be a FREE-WILLED "choice" - though having an immutable Hell-bound-and-destined Consequence.

Now WHERE have I heard that QUESTIONABLY-sacred word before? Usually with so-called "reproductive freedom" of becoming enslaved to non-reproductively murdering babies and so heading all enslaved-by-annihilationists humanity to non-fulfilled and miserable extinction?

TOPIC: "Treason?"

Is it "treason" to declare that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT "the President of the United States," or is it instead "treason" to assert that Obama IS "the President of the United States?"

It is possible (and in the case of yours truly, a certainty) to, at the same time, support "the United States of America" and the Constitutional "Bill of Rights of the United States" while only PARTIALLY supporting "the [present-administration] government of the United States of [slightly-over-half-of] the people and by the [slightly-over-half-of] people and for the [slightly-over-half-of] people" and only supporting SOME of beyond-the-first-ten Amendments of the United States Constitution.

Keep in mind that the 18th Amendment forbidding the sale, manufacture, and transport of alcoholic beverages was REPEALED by the 21st Amendment [to the dismay of Capone and Syndicate bootleggers], and one can thus (and should) both submit and contend that even before the 21st Amendment was created and enacted, the 18th Amendment was unconstitutional - being that it was destined to become repealed by a future Amendment. Part of the rationale for repealing the anti-liquor 18th Amendment was that Jesus created wine from water for the marriage at Cana according to the Biblical Text, and the Holy Spirit through Saint Paul wrote in First Timothy 5:23 that a little wine should be ingested for the sake of one's stomach and frequent ailments.

It would have been acceptable for the 18th Amendment to have been accurately worded to instead prohibit drunkenness with anything intoxicating, like alcohol or narcotics.

The same situation applies to the 19th Amendment, essentially stating that voting in elections should not be prohibited on the basis of "sex."

That needs to also be repealed for two reasons:

(1) The use of the word "sex" is semantically inappropriate, being that the word "gender" should have instead been used. The definitions and scope of "sex" go WAY beyond the concept of gender by (of definitional necessity) including various forms of legitimate and illicit sexual behaviors and types, some of which are irrespective of implied whichever-[human?]-only gender.

(2) The premise of implied female humans being implied equal with male humans in terms of political and government-related authority and opportunity are obviously contrary to and in opposition against Scripture, such as the references of:

Gen 3:16 To the woman he said, "I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you."

Lev 27: 1 The LORD said to Moses,
2 "Say to the people of Israel, When a man makes a special vow of persons to the LORD at your valuation,
3 then your valuation of a male from twenty years old up to sixty years old shall be fifty shekels of silver, according to the shekel of the sanctuary.
4 If the person is a female, your valuation shall be thirty shekels.
5 If the person is from five years old up to twenty years old, your valuation shall be for a male twenty shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
6 If the person is from a month old up to five years old, your valuation shall be for a male five shekels of silver, and for a female your valuation shall be three shekels of silver.
7 And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then your valuation for a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female ten shekels."

Num 5:31 The man shall be free from iniquity, but the woman shall bear her iniquity."

Num 30:6 And if she is married to a husband, while under her vows or any thoughtless utterance of her lips by which she has bound herself,
7 and her husband hears of it, and says nothing to her on the day that he hears; then her vows shall stand, and her pledges by which she has bound herself shall stand.
8 But if, on the day that her husband comes to hear of it, he expresses disapproval, then he shall make void her vow which was on her, and the thoughtless utterance of her lips, by which she bound herself; and the LORD will forgive her.
13 Any vow and any binding oath to afflict herself, her husband may establish, or her husband may make void.

Eccl 7:25 I turned my mind to know and to search out and to seek wisdom and the sum of things, and to know the wickedness of folly and the foolishness which is insanity.
26 And I found more bitter than death the woman whose heart is snares and nets, and whose hands are fetters; he who pleases God escapes her, but the sinner is taken by her.
27 Hey, this is what I found, says the Preacher, adding one thing to another to find the sum,
28 which my mind has sought repeatedly, but I have not found. One man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not found.
29 Hey, this alone I found, that God made man upright, but they have sought out many devices.

Isaiah 3:12 My people: children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. Oh my people, your leaders mislead you, and confuse the course of your paths.
13 The LORD has taken His place to contend, he stands to judge His people.

Nahum 3:12 All your fortresses are like fig trees with first-ripe figs: if shaken they fall into the mouth of the eater.
13 Hey, your troops are women in your midst. The gates of your land are wide open to your foes; fire has devoured your bars.
14 Draw water for the siege, strengthen your forts; go into the clay, tread the mortar, take hold of the brick mold!
15 There will the fire devour you, the sword will cut you off. It will devour you like the locust. Multiply yourselves like the locust, multiply like the grasshopper!
16 You increased your merchants more than the stars of the heavens. The locust spreads its wings and flies away.
19 There is no assuaging your hurt, your wound is grievous. All who hear the news of you clap their hands over you. For upon whom has not come your unceasing evil?

First Corinthians 11:1 Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ.
2 I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the traditions even as I have delivered them to you.
3 But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.
8 For man was not made from woman, but woman from man.
9 Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.

First Timothy 2:11 Let a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness.
12 I allow no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
15 Yet woman will be saved through bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with sobriety.

First Peter 3:5 So once the holy women who hoped in God used to adorn themselves and were submissive to their husbands,
6 as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him sir. And you are now her children if you do right and let nothing terrify you.
7 Likewise you husbands, live considerately with your wives, bestowing honor on the woman as the weaker gender, since you are joint heirs of the grace of life, in order that your prayers may not be hindered.

Now, one of the Amendments beyond the first ten of them state the idea that "a President shall be a natural-born citizen."

That clearly means that he (not "she") must NOT have been born in a foreign country, but instead on United States territory.

Barack Hussein Obama [a.k.a. Barry Soetoro] was NOT born in Hawaii, but by a deceitful manipulation of non-constitutional Hawaiian regulations allowed him to artificially be falsely designated as being born there. In reality, and according to the honestly-depicting birth-certificate images available to see at and and other sites on the Web, Barack Hussein Obama (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro) was born in Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa Kenya. Thus he is, in NO way, a natural-born United States citizen.

That means that him running for the Presidency was both non-constitutional and (arguably) even treason. That means that those voting for him were committing non-constitutional treason. That means that those who put him into the Oval Office committed non-constitutional treason, and everyone who now calls him "President" Obama is, arguably, committing non-constitutional treason. And that means that all those Obama appointees who are functioning in various departments of the United States government are committing non-constitutional treason.

There are two non-violent ways to deal with that, and rectification can occur both ways - especially for those who want to absolve themselves from the charge of committing non-constitutional treason:

(a) a majority of both houses of Congress fully impeaching Obama out of office as soon as practically possible

(b) electing and installing someone other than Barack Hussein Obama into the Presidency using the 2016 Election.